Developers and general contractors
Projects with dozens of contractors, where the estimate, actuals and payments sit in separate spreadsheets across project controls, procurement, site QA/QC and accounting.
Estimate, accepted quantities and payments for every contractor in one system. You pay only for work accepted on site and see delays before they turn into penalties.
Tap to see on-site acceptance and an overpayment being stopped.
Projects with dozens of contractors, where the estimate, actuals and payments sit in separate spreadsheets across project controls, procurement, site QA/QC and accounting.
Engineers accept work from a tablet with photos, the system checks it against the estimate and contract, and management sees plan, actuals and remaining work for every contractor.
Overpayments are caught before payment, delays show up early, and the owner's report builds itself. On a large site that means $220k saved per week.
Quantities are closed on the contractor's own certificates, and the check against the estimate is manual and late. Overpayment surfaces after the money is gone.
Project controls, finance, procurement and accounting each keep their own version of the quantity sheets. Every handoff between departments adds errors.
Management cannot see what is happening on site right now. Reports are assembled by hand from different files, taking anywhere from two hours to two months.
Remaining work is counted by hand. By the time a delay is visible it is too late to react, and late delivery turns into penalties to buyers.
The project estimate, contractor cost breakdowns and the contractor register from your ERP go in with one action. More than 70 checks immediately flag overruns and errors.
The engineer records quantities with photos, site QA/QC confirms quality, and the site manager closes the work. Progress billing is drafted from closed quantities.
Management gets one dashboard: plan, actuals, remaining work and payments by project, block and contractor. Everyone sees and edits only their own part.
▤Block A estimate · 1,846 line items
▤Contractor cost breakdowns · 12 files
▤Contractor register from ERP
✓Units and quantities by section match the design
!Contractor B: screed 420 m² over design · ≈$6.6k to remove
!Contractor C: price per m² 18% above reference · ≈$5.5k
$$12k found before payment · tasks sent to planning
A large site with more than 300 people on it. Finishing works were tracked in scattered Excel files across four departments, and plan and actuals never matched. Since Frame went live, estimates and cost breakdowns are checked on upload, quantities are accepted from a tablet, and management sees plan vs. actual for every contractor. Before the start I held 17 interviews with departments in 5 days.
The same system, used to control a road contract. Acceptance used to run on scanned certificates and Excel. Now estimate, actuals and payment meet in one system, and discrepancies and double payments show up before acceptance.
After the call you send the estimate and cost breakdowns, and three days later I show Frame on your project's data. Then eight weeks to a working system.
Your cloud in your jurisdiction (EU data residency available) or on-premise hardware in your network. Only you hold the access; external access goes through a VPN.
Roles with separated permissions: whoever enters data does not approve it. Money and banking details are visible only to those who need them.
An immutable action log, versions of every upload, daily backups. When an employee leaves, access is revoked in a minute.
We'll look at how plan and actuals are reconciled today, and three days later I'll show the system on your project's data.
Discuss your project→